SIGN UP FOR OUR UPDATES LIST--CLICK HERE!


Resident Arses:

Alex

 

 

Laura Elizabeth

 

Ragnar

 

wanusmaximus

 

Members

« Mousegun Shootout : Selecti... | Front page | L.A. City Council Passes Ne... »

Michael Steele has been getting a lot of buzz in his race for RNC Chairman.

 

Unfortunately, Steele has been less than 100% supportive of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.  I'm particularly troubled by this interchange:

Q: Should people have access to buy assault weapons or any gun that they want?

 

A: Well, I mean you draw the line.  I mean, what do you need an assault weapon for?  I mean, if going hunting, I think that's a little overkill or whatever, but the reality of it is, I think it's important for a society, a community to draw the lines as we've drawn in a number of other constitutional areas, but I don't think that that means that you go to a total ban for those who want to use guns for skeet shooting and hobbying and hunting and things like that.

Sad to say, but this same quote could've been spouted by Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.  It's the LEFTIES who think the Second Amendment has something to do with hunting.

 

Michael Steele's weakness on gun rights has had me looking elsewhere for a candidate to support.

 

One of the names mentioned as an alternative to Michael Steele is Ken Blackwell.

 

After reading some of Blackwell's writing on the Second Amendment, I am happy to report that Ken Blackwell is not at all equivocal in his support for the Second Amendment.

 

Here's Ken Blackwell on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms:

Less
Growing up in the Blackwell household in the central city neighborhoods of Cincinnati informed my public policy work as mayor of the Queen City and as an undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Families like mine — low income, civically engaged, and responsible — expected access to firearms for safety. Then, as now, criminals were not inclined to break into a house where the owner was armed.
 
Things were tougher in the South where the Deacons of Defense, most of whom were veterans like my father, chased away KKK riders and thugs. These groups of armed men patrolled their neighborhoods to keep them safe at night. Whether it’s an individual or a family who has to fight against random criminals or organized threats, our lives are evidence that Americans, particularly women and minorities in today’s urban areas, need our Second Amendment rights.

From another column by Blackwell:

From their beginnings, gun control measures have worked to create legal disparities, granting unequal rights to members of various socioeconomic groups.

 

In fact, restrictive gun laws have long been employed to the benefit of a select elite while circumscribing the liberty of populations less popular or less powerful.

 

Gun control measures, from the slave gun bans of the 1700s South to the Brady Bill regulations of the 1990s have unfairly targeted black Americans and have worked to curtail a disproportionate number of their constitutional rights. Access to firearms was understood by our founders and many early American jurists as an essential aspect of full US citizenship, and it was for this reason that the Black Codes established after the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment -- which constitutionally abolished slavery -- prevented black freemen from owning guns...

 

Examining both our nation’s constitution and the history of gun rights in America, the right to keep and bear arms has been at the forefront of our nation’s march to liberty and equality. The Second Amendment, which empowers Americans to embrace all of the freedoms and responsibilities their citizenship entails, has been the catalyst of tremendous social progress.

From another of Blackwell's columns:

What kind of “right” do you have, when the government can completely rob you of 100% of the exercise of that right, anytime they decide they have a good reason?

 

That’s like saying you have the right to worship as you choose, but the government has the power to ban attending church. Or that you have the right to free speech, but that government has the power to stop you from speaking about any subject it wants. Or that you have the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, but that anything the government wants to search at your house is automatically reasonable.

 

A right that the government can completely take away at any time is no right at all.

So to say that the Second Amendment means you can own guns, but that the city where you live can ban all gun ownership, then you have no Second Amendment rights at all.

More of Ken Blackwell's writings on guns and the Second Amendment here.

by Thor  2008-12-18 15:35:48
Even Ken Blackwell doesn't totally grasp the intent of the 2nd Amendment. While I DO like his stance a lot better that Steele's, it's still not what I'm looking for. I believe as our Framers did. Our weapons are necessary for not only defense of ourselves, our property, our survival, but to potentially overthrow a tyrannical government. WHEN I see a politician recognize our Framer's full intent, I will support that one with 100% of my effort.
by Michelle  2008-12-18 16:22:03
I see that Steele flubbed the 2nd Amendment, however there is no way in God's Green Earth that I will support Ken Blackwell at GOP Chair. I watched him run for Ohio Gov...trust me when I say we do NOT need his influence on our future races (he lost by a MILLION votes in a state that has a 50/50 political party mix..his campaign was a DISASTER and it all fell straight back to his doorstep. Hell, we had Republicans openly supporting his rival PROUDLY. (not me, however I did stare at the absentee ballot for 30 mins shaking my head and telling myself to "go along to get along")
Personally, I couldn't get his bumper sticker off my car and his sign out of yard quick enough (ever hear a blowdryer at 3 a.m. in a driveway?? ask my neighbors..they did).
« Mousegun Shootout : Selecti... | Front page | L.A. City Council Passes Ne... »